Comments on the papers recently published by Kalaivani et al.

Srinivasan, B.R.; Narvekar, K.U.

dc.contributor.author	Srinivasan, B.R.
dc.contributor.author	Narvekar, K.U.
dc.date.accessioned	2016-03-03T09:07:55Z724
dc.date.available	2016-03-03T09:07:55Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Crystal Growth. 440(); 2016; 110-112.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.12.049
dc.identifier.uri	http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/1947
dc.description.abstract	We argue that the so-called l-lysinium succinate 1 (Kalaivani et al. (2015), zinc chloride doped l-lysinium succinate 2 (Kalaivani et al. (2015), l-threonine phthalate 3 (Elberin Mary Theras et al. (2015) and sodium acetate doped l-tyrosine 4 (Arthi et al. (2015) are all dubious crystals. Taking compounds 1–4 as examples we show that EDAX is an inappropriate method for characterization of new materials based on elemental composition data.
dc.publisher	Elsevier	en_US
dc.subject	Chemistry	en_US
dc.title	Comments on the papers recently published by Kalaivani et al.	en_US
dc.type	Journal article	en_US
dc.identifier.impf	y