| dc.contributor.author | Srinivasan, B.R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-14-03T04:32:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-14-03T04:32:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Optik: International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 127(12); 2016; 4941-4942. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.02.046 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/3117 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this communication it is proved that the recently reported 'L-threonine phthalate' (Theras et al. Optik. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.12.107) 'L-threonine phosphate' (Chinnappan et al., Optik 126 (2015) 5517–5521) 'L-threonine formate' (Hanumantharao and Kalainathan, Optik 124 (2013) 2204–2209) and 'L-threonine diformate' (Viju et al., Optik 125 (2014) 5926–5928) are dubious crystals. Taking the title crystals as examples the importance of nomenclature of nonlinear optical crystals is highlighted. | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.subject | Chemistry | en_US |
| dc.title | Comments on the growth of 'L-threonine phthalate', 'L-threonine phosphate', 'L-threonine formate' and 'L-threonine diformate' crystals | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.impf | y |