dc.contributor.author |
Srinivasan, B.R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2016-14-03T04:32:37Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2016-14-03T04:32:37Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Optik: International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 127(12); 2016; 4941-4942. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.02.046 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/3117 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
In this communication it is proved that the recently reported 'L-threonine phthalate' (Theras et al. Optik. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.12.107) 'L-threonine phosphate' (Chinnappan et al., Optik 126 (2015) 5517–5521) 'L-threonine formate' (Hanumantharao and Kalainathan, Optik 124 (2013) 2204–2209) and 'L-threonine diformate' (Viju et al., Optik 125 (2014) 5926–5928) are dubious crystals. Taking the title crystals as examples the importance of nomenclature of nonlinear optical crystals is highlighted. |
|
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
|
dc.subject |
Chemistry |
en_US |
dc.title |
Comments on the growth of 'L-threonine phthalate', 'L-threonine phosphate', 'L-threonine formate' and 'L-threonine diformate' crystals |
en_US |
dc.type |
Journal article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.impf |
y |
|