Comments on: "Crystal growth and comparison of vibrational and thermal properties of semi-organic nonlinear optical materials"

Srinivasan, B.R.; Fernandes, R.

dc.contributor.author	Srinivasan, B.R.
dc.contributor.author	Fernandes, R.
dc.date.accessioned	2016-03-15T04:55:05Z
dc.date.available	2016-03-15T04:55:05Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.citation	Pramana: Journal of Physics 86(3); 2016; 719-722.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/pram/086/03/0719-0722
dc.identifier.uri	http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/4204
dc.description.abstract	In Pramana – J. Phys. 75, 683 (2010), Gunasekaran et al reported that they have grown the nonlinear optical crystals, urea thiourea mercuric chloride (UTHC) and urea thiourea mercuric sulphate (UTHS). We argue that UTHC and UTHS are dubious crystals and are not what the authors propose.	en_US
dc.publisher	Indian Academy of Sciences, Bangalore
dc.subject	Chemistry	en_US
dc.title	Comments on: "Crystal growth and comparison of vibrational and thermal properties of semi-organic nonlinear optical materials"	en_US
dc.type	Journal article	en_US
dc.identifier.impf	y