Comment on "A study on structural, optical, mechanical and ferroelectric properties of tri-glycine barium nitrate single crystals"

Petrosyan, A.M.; Ghazaryan, V.V.; Tylczynski, Z.; Srinivasan, B.R.

dc.contributor.author	Petrosyan, A.M.
dc.contributor.author	Ghazaryan, V.V.
dc.contributor.author	Tylczynski, Z.
dc.contributor.author	Srinivasan, B.R.
dc.date.accessioned	2015-12-07T03:06:45Z
dc.date.available	2015-12-07T03:06:45Z
dc.date.issued	2015
dc.identifier.citation	Ferroelectric Letters Section. 42; 2015; 139-141.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07315171.2015.1068970
dc.identifier.uri	http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/4231
dc.description.abstract	We argue that the "tri-glycine barium nitrate" crystal reported by R. Ezhil Vizhi and D. Rajan Babu, Ferroeclectrics Letters Section 40, 1-10 (2013) is not a new ferroelectric but a dubious crystal.	en_US
dc.publisher	Taylor and Francis	en_US
dc.subject	Chemistry	en_US
dc.title	Comment on "A study on structural, optical, mechanical and ferroelectric properties of tri-glycine barium nitrate single crystals"	en_US
dc.type	Journal article	en_US
dc.identifier.impf	y