| dc.contributor.author | Srinivasan, B.R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-20T02:41:03Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-05-20T02:41:03Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Optik: International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 127(16); 2016; 6477-6478. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.04.135 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/4356 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The authors of a recent paper (Optik 127 (2016) 3582-3589) report to have grown a so called bis (thiourea) strontium chloride (BTSC) and claim it to be a potential optoelectronic material. In this comment it is shown that this claim is dubious and BTSC reported once earlier by Hajiyani et al. (Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 21 (2010) 735-747) is actually thiourea. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
| dc.subject | Chemistry | en_US |
| dc.title | Is bis (thiourea) strontium chloride a potential optoelectronic material? | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.impf | y |