dc.contributor.author |
Nevgi, R. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Das, G. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Acet, M. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Priolkar, K.R. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2019-08-19T06:07:58Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2019-08-19T06:07:58Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2019 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 797; 2019; 995-1001. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.172 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/5817 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Martensitic transition temperature steadily decreases in Ni sub(2-x)Fe sub(x)Mn sub(1.5)In sub(0.5) and is completely suppressed at x = 0.2. Despite suppression of martensitic transition, Ni sub(1.8)Fe sub(0.2)Mn sub(1.5)In sub(0.5) does not display the expected strain glassy phase. Instead, a ground state with dominant ferromagnetic interactions is observed. A study of structural and magnetic properties of x = 0.2 reveal that the alloy consists of a major Fe rich cubic phase and a minor Fe deficient monoclinic phase favoring a ferromagnetic ground state. This is exactly opposite of that observed in Ni sub(2)Mn sub(1−y)Fe sub(y)In sub(0.5) wherein a strain glassy phase is observed for y = 0.1. The change in site symmetry of Fe when doped for Ni in contrast to Mn in the Heusler composition seems to support the growth of the ferromagnetic phase. |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Elsevier |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Physics |
en_US |
dc.title |
Importance of site occupancy and absence of strain glassy phase in Ni sub(2-x)Fe sub(x)Mn sub(1.5)In sub(0.5) |
en_US |
dc.type |
Journal article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.impf |
y |
|