dc.contributor.author | Petrosyan, A.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Srinivasan, B.R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-09-17T04:41:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-09-17T04:41:41Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chinese Journal of Physics. 61; 2019; 272-273. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjph.2019.09.002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/5848 | |
dc.description.abstract | We prove that the recently published "urea oxalic acid" is not parabanic acid but is in fact the well-known bis-urea oxalic acid. Hence the paper by Jeeva et al (Chinese J. Phys. 56(2018) 1449-1466) is completely erroneous. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.subject | Chemistry | en_US |
dc.title | Urea oxalic acid is not parabanic acid | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.identifier.impf | y |