Comments on the paper ‘Co-crystals of urea and hexanedioic acid with third-order nonlinear properties: An experimental and theoretical enquiry’

Srinivasan, B.R.; Naik, S.G.; Petrosyan, A.M.

dc.contributor.author	Srinivasan, B.R.
dc.contributor.author	Naik, S.G.
dc.contributor.author	Petrosyan, A.M.
dc.date.accessioned	2020-04-29T05:23:06Z
dc.date.available	2020-04-29T05:23:06Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Molecular Structure. 1216; 2020; ArticleID_128306.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128306
dc.identifier.uri	http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/6036
dc.description.abstract	The authors of a recent paper (J. Mol Struc. 1202 (2020) 127237) claim to have grown a so-called ‘urea hexanedioic acid’ (UHA) cocrystal by the slow evaporation of an aqueous solution containing equimolar amounts of urea and hexanedioic acid. In this comment, many points of criticism, concerning the crystal growth, single crystal data, IR spectrum and theoretical study of the so called UHA crystal are highlighted to prove that the title paper is completely erroneous.	en_US
dc.publisher	Elsevier	en_US
dc.subject	Chemistry	en_US
dc.title	Comments on the paper ‘Co-crystals of urea and hexanedioic acid with third-order nonlinear properties: An experimental and theoretical enquiry’	en_US
dc.type	Journal article	en_US
dc.identifier.impf	y