Comments on the paper "Two-step in-situ hydrothermal synthesis of nanosheet-constructed porous MnMoS sub(4) arrays on 3D Ni foam as a binder-free electrode in high performance supercapacitors"

Srinivasan, B.R.; Porob, D.G.

dc.contributor.author	Srinivasan, B.R.
dc.contributor.author	Porob, D.G.
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-18T04:23:16Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-18T04:23:16Z
dc.date.issued	2021
dc.identifier.citation	Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 634; 2021; ArticleID_127911.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127911
dc.identifier.uri	http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/6614
dc.description.abstract	The authors of the title paper (Colloids and Surfaces A 606 (2020) 125456) reported to have hydrothermally synthesized nanosheet-constructed porous MnMoS sub(4) arrays on 3D Ni foam as a binder-free electrode in high performance supercapacitors. A critical analysis of the reported results viz. X-ray powder pattern and the elemental composition reveals that the electrode material is not MnMoS sub(4) as it contains substantial oxygen in addition to less Mo content than Mn. In this letter to the Editor, many points of criticism concerning the hydrothermal synthesis and interpretation of the experimental data are described to prove that MnMoS sub(4) (I) is a dubious material.	en_US
dc.publisher	Elsevier	en_US
dc.subject	Chemistry	en_US
dc.title	Comments on the paper "Two-step in-situ hydrothermal synthesis of nanosheet-constructed porous MnMoS sub(4) arrays on 3D Ni foam as a binder-free electrode in high performance supercapacitors"	en_US
dc.type	Journal article	en_US
dc.identifier.impf	y