dc.contributor.author |
Shringare, A. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Fernandes, S. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-02-28T05:36:52Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-02-28T05:36:52Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
State and Local Government Review. 52(3); 2020; 195-199. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X20984524 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/6718 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The inter-governmental response to the COVID-19 pandemic in India not only revealed centralized tendencies but also exposed weaknesses in the administrative and planning processes needed for a cohesive but flexible national response. This paper highlights some of the subnational states' early responses to increasing COVID-19 cases and argues that, while India resorted to centralized measures to deal with the pandemic, a decentralized response may have proved more beneficial. Policy recommendations following this line of thinking conclude the article. |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Sage |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Political Science |
en_US |
dc.title |
COVID-19 pandemic in India points to need for a decentralized response |
en_US |
dc.type |
Journal article |
en_US |
dc.identifier.impf |
cs |
|