| dc.contributor.author | Shringare, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fernandes, S. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-28T05:36:52Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-02-28T05:36:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | State and Local Government Review. 52(3); 2020; 195-199. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X20984524 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://irgu.unigoa.ac.in/drs/handle/unigoa/6718 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The inter-governmental response to the COVID-19 pandemic in India not only revealed centralized tendencies but also exposed weaknesses in the administrative and planning processes needed for a cohesive but flexible national response. This paper highlights some of the subnational states' early responses to increasing COVID-19 cases and argues that, while India resorted to centralized measures to deal with the pandemic, a decentralized response may have proved more beneficial. Policy recommendations following this line of thinking conclude the article. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Sage | en_US |
| dc.subject | Political Science | en_US |
| dc.title | COVID-19 pandemic in India points to need for a decentralized response | en_US |
| dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
| dc.identifier.impf | cs |