| dc.description.abstract |
The Constitution of India was envisioned by its framers as a living, adaptable document capable of responding to the evolving moral, political, and economic needs of society. Since its commencement in 1950, it has undergone over one hundred amendments, each reflecting the dynamic nature of Indian democracy and governance. Through a doctrinal-historical and socio-legal lens, this article examines how constitutional amendments have influenced social equity, federal balance, and democratic accountability. It also evaluates the role of the judiciary in mediating between legislative will and constitutional limitation, focusing on major judgments such as Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, and I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu. The study concludes that while amendments have been pivotal in promoting inclusion, decentralization, and reform, their legitimacy depends on adherence to the "basic structure" doctrine and the broader principles of constitutional morality. |
en_US |