Abstract:
The discourse surrounding gun control legislation in India is markedly different from the debates surrounding the Second Amendment in the United States. India does not have a constitutional provision equivalent to the Second Amendment; instead, firearm ownership and regulation are governed primarily by the Arms Act of 1959 and related legislation. The language of Indian firearm laws is precise, emphasizing licensing, public safety, and the prevention of misuse, reflecting a cautious and centralized regulatory approach. This paper examines the legal, social, and cultural contexts that influence gun control legislation in India and contrasts them with the principles underpinning the Second Amendment in the U.S. By focusing on legal language, judicial interpretation, and statutory implementation, the study explores how Indian laws balance individual self-defence rights with collective security imperatives. Furthermore, it analyses public perception, crime trends, and legislative debates to understand the rationale behind India's stringent firearm regulation. The findings underscore the centrality of legal language in shaping policy, guiding judicial reasoning, and influencing societal attitudes toward firearms. Ultimately, this study highlights the challenges of importing or comparing foreign constitutional concepts like the Second Amendment into the Indian legal and cultural framework, offering insights for policymakers, scholars, and legal practitioners.
