Abstract:
Collective bargaining and trade unionism constitute the cornerstone of industrial democracy and participatory governance in modern labour jurisprudence. India's experience with collective bargaining reflects a complex interweaving of colonial industrial relations, nationalist political movements, and post-constitutional commitments to social justice. The paper traces the historical evolution of collective bargaining from the late nineteenth-century labour associations through the statutory consolidation of the Trade Unions Act, 1926 and the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, situating these developments within the broader socioeconomic framework of India's planned industrialisation. It examines judicial interpretation by the Supreme Court of India, which has balanced the constitutional right to association under Article 19(1)(c) with public-order and managerial prerogatives. Drawing on secondary sources-including statutory texts, case law reports, law-review articles, and government publications-the study identifies structural barriers that hinder effective collective bargaining: the proliferation of politically affiliated unions, the predominance of informal labour, employer contractualization, and procedural backlogs. The analysis shows that despite a robust statutory scheme, collective bargaining in India remains fragmented and sector-specific, thriving in public-sector undertakings but weak in private and informal domains. The paper concludes that revitalising collective bargaining in India requires an integrated approach combining legal reform, institutional restructuring, and recognition of new worker collectivities suited to twenty-first-century labour markets.
